Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewPubMed

The utility of adipose-derived stem cells and stromal vascular fraction for oncologic soft tissue reconstruction: Is it safe? A matter for debate.

Tan SS., Loh W.

Narrative Review on Facial Rejuvenation, published in Surgeon (2016) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Surgeon (2016)
Country
Scotland
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
27810224
DOI
10.1016/j.surge.2016.09.010
Citations
13

Abstract (original English)

Autologous free-fat grafting (AFG) has emerged as an attractive proposition for soft-tissue reconstruction of various contour defects because it obviates more complex reconstructive options and reduces operative times and donor-site morbidity. Nonetheless, a common complication of this procedure is the resorption of the engrafted fat. Cell-assisted lipotransfer (CAL) is now a well-regarded technique where adipose-derived stem cell (ASC)-rich stromal vascular fraction is admixed with lipoaspirate, increasing the volumetric outcome of fat grafts in light of its potent angiogenic and adipogenic properties. Criticisms, however, remain regarding this modality especially for the treatment of post-oncologic defects. Laboratory data has attested to its propensity to perpetuate tumor cells as a result of its paracrine effects on the host microenvironment. This review article aims to present the underlying facts behind ASC therapy and provide meaningful discourse as to its utility in post-oncologic soft tissue reconstruction.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
HumansLipectomyMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationPlastic Surgery ProceduresSoft Tissue NeoplasmsSubcutaneous Fat

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research