Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyPubMedOpen access

Visceral and subcutaneous adipose stem cells modulate colorectal cancer cell progression: direct and indirect contact distinctly accelerate tumor aggressiveness.

Domagalski M., Nowak D., Schmidt P., Pietraszek-Gremplewicz K.

Laboratory Study on Chronic Wound, published in Mol Med (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Mol Med (2026)
Country
England
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
41872748
PMCID
PMC13130794
DOI
10.1186/s10020-026-01464-x

Abstract (original English)

Background Adipose tissue is increasingly recognized as an important component of the tumor microenvironment of colorectal cancer (CRC) and actively contributes to the progression of the disease. Adipose stem cells (ASCs), one of its key constituents, can interact with cancer cells and contribute to tumorigenic processes. However, there is a poor understanding of the underlying basis of ASC-mediated support in the progression of CRC. Methodology In this study, we employed direct and indirect co-culture models to investigate interactions between ASCs and colorectal cancer cells. The study was performed using human visceral ASCs (V-ASCs) and subcutaneous ASCs (S-ASCs), along with three colorectal cancer cell lines. The analyses primarily focused on the characteristics of CRC cell progression in 2D and 3D conditions. Cell proliferation and migration after indirect co-culture were assessed using video microscopy, XTT assay, wound healing, and spontaneous migration assay. Corresponding measurements for direct co-culture were performed using high-throughput confocal microscopy. Changes in the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) such as the phenotype and stemness features were evaluated by confocal microscopy imaging, while gene and protein expression were analyzed using qRT-PCR and Western blotting. Additional analyses were conducted using cells cultured in spheroid models with b

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
HumansColorectal NeoplasmsCell MovementCoculture TechniquesStem CellsCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCell CommunicationTumor MicroenvironmentDisease Progression

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research