Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyPubMed

In vitro comparative study of human mesenchymal stromal cells from dermis and adipose tissue for application in skin wound healing.

Zomer HD., Varela GKDS., Delben PB., Heck D., Jeremias TDS., Trentin AG.

Laboratory Study on Chronic Wound, published in J Tissue Eng Regen Med (2019) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
J Tissue Eng Regen Med (2019)
Country
England
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
30773827
DOI
10.1002/term.2820

Abstract (original English)

Novel strategies combining cell therapy, tissue engineering, and regenerative medicine have been developed to treat major skin wounds. Although mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) from different tissues have similar stem cell features, such as self-renewing mesodermal differentiation potential and expression of immunophenotypic markers, they also have distinct characteristics. Therefore, we aimed to characterize the application of MSCs derived from the dermis and adipose tissue (DSCs and ASCs, respectively) in cutaneous wound healing by in vitro approaches. Human DSC and ASC were obtained and evaluated for their isolation efficiency, stemness, proliferative profile, and genetic stability over time in culture. The ability of wound closure was first assessed by direct cell scratch assay. The paracrine effects of DSC- and ASC-conditioned medium in dermal fibroblasts and keratinocytes and in the induction of tubule formation were also investigated. Although the ASC isolation procedures resulted in 100 times more cells than DSC, the latter had a higher proliferation rate in culture. Both presented low frequency of nuclear alterations over time in culture and showed similar characteristics of stem cells, such as expression of immunophenotypic markers and differentiation potential. DSCs showed increased healing capacity, and their conditioned media had greater paracrine effect in closing

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueDermisFibroblastsHumansKeratinocytesMesenchymal Stem CellsWound Healing

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research