Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsProspective StudyPubMed

Which Fat Processing Can Achieve Optimal Transplantation in Patients With Insufficient Fat Resource?

Kang D., Fu S., Luan J.

Prospective Study on Facial Rejuvenation, published in Ann Plast Surg (2019) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Prospective Study
Journal
Ann Plast Surg (2019)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
31524743
DOI
10.1097/SAP.0000000000001852
Citations
5

Abstract (original English)

Autologous fat transfer has been widely used in breast augment surgery. The breast fat graft is different form facial, it needs megavolume grafts. However, most Asian women are thin, who often encounter the fat resource insufficiency during breast augmentation. In fact, some processing methods do contribute to great loss of potential fat that could have been grafted. How to choose a best processing method to achieve optimal transfer in patients with insufficient fat resources is fairly important. Lipoaspirate was obtained from 10 healthy female patients who underwent liposuction from abdomen. According to the processing methods, 10-mL initial fat grafts divided into 4 groups: decantation (group A), centrifugation (group B), cotton pad (group C), and cell-assisted lipotransfer (CAL) (group D). Lipoaspirate from each group was compared in the vitro and vivo experiments. The content and function of stromal vascular fraction (SVF) were compared as well as lipoaspirate survival after grafting in nude mice. The SVFs were counted in decantation group 4.32 ± 0.75 × 10/mL, centrifuge group 3.48 ± 0.78 × 10/mL, cotton pad group 1.64 ± 0.84 × 10/mL, CAL group 4.08 ± 0.73 × 10/mL. The decantation group was higher than the cotton pad group (P < 0.05). All the groups' SVFs had capability of multilineage differentiation. The fat graft weight in decantation group: 0.3908 ± 0.023 g, centrifuge

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence
Abdominal FatAnimalsBiopsy, NeedleChinaDisease Models, AnimalFemaleGraft RejectionGraft SurvivalHealthy VolunteersHumans

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research