Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewPubMed

Wound-Induced Hair Neogenesis Model.

Xue Y., Lim CH., Plikus MV., Ito M., Cotsarelis G., Garza LA.

Narrative Review on Chronic Wound, Scar, Hair Loss, published in J Invest Dermatol (2022) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
J Invest Dermatol (2022)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
36153062
DOI
10.1016/j.jid.2022.07.013

Abstract (original English)

Skin wounds in adult mammals typically heal with a fibrotic scar and fail to restore ectodermal appendages, such as hair follicles or adipose tissue. Intriguingly, new hair follicles regenerate in the center of large full-thickness wounds of mice in a process called wound-induced hair neogenesis (WIHN). WIHN is followed by neogenesis of dermal adipose tissue. Both neogenic events reactivate embryonic-like cellular and molecular programs. The WIHN model provides a platform for studying mammalian regeneration, and findings from this model could instruct future regenerative medicine interventions for treating wounds and alopecia. Since Ito et al. rediscovered WIHN 15 years ago, numerous investigators have worked on the WIHN model using varying wounding protocols and model interpretations. Because a variety of factors, including environmental variables and choice of mouse strains, can affect the outcomes of a WIHN study, the purpose of this article is to provide an overview of the experimental variables that impact WIHN so that experiments between laboratories can be compared in a meaningful manner.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AnimalsHairHair FollicleMammalsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLRegenerationSkinWound Healing

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research