Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewPubMed

Adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction processed with different systems for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a pilot study on cell proliferation and clinical results.

Papalia R., Zampogna B., Russo F., Vasta S., Campi S., Saccone L.

Narrative Review on Knee Osteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis, published in J Biol Regul Homeost Agents (2020) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
J Biol Regul Homeost Agents (2020)
Country
Singapore
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
33739015
Citations
6

Abstract (original English)

In recent years, the interest in stromal vascular fraction (SVF) therapy for conservative treatment of osteoarthritis has grown significantly. This study aims to assess three different processing systems (micro-fragmentation, filtration, or slow centrifugation) in terms of cell proliferation in vitro and clinical results of intraarticular injections for the treatment of knee OA. From December 2017 to June 2018, 25 procedures were performed using three different systems. A considerable improvement of the clinical condition in almost all patients already one month after the treatment with a stable effect at 6 and 12 months was recorded. Patients treated with SVF, obtained by the micro-fragmentation system, had better outcomes one month after the treatment with a mean improvement of the symptomatology higher than that found in patients treated with the filtration or slow centrifugation system. The SVF product from the same system had a higher cell proliferation capacity in vitro.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueCell ProliferationHumansMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationOsteoarthritis, KneePilot ProjectsStromal CellsTreatment Outcome

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research