Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Cardiac Cell Therapy: Insights into the Mechanisms of Tissue Repair

Peng H., Shindo K., Donahue RR., Abdel-Latif A.

Narrative Review on Cardiovascular Disease, Chronic Wound, Immune Modulation, published in Int J Mol Sci (2021) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Int J Mol Sci (2021)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
33530466
PMCID
PMC7865339
DOI
10.3390/ijms22031201
Citations
12

Abstract (original English)

Stem cell-based cardiac therapies have been extensively studied in recent years. However, the efficacy of cell delivery, engraftment, and differentiation post-transplant remain continuous challenges and represent opportunities to further refine our current strategies. Despite limited long-term cardiac retention, stem cell treatment leads to sustained cardiac benefit following myocardial infarction (MI). This review summarizes the current knowledge on stem cell based cardiac immunomodulation by highlighting the cellular and molecular mechanisms of different immune responses to mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and their secretory factors. This review also addresses the clinical evidence in the field.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Myoblasts, CardiacStem CellsMesenchymal Stem CellsAnimalsHumansHeart DiseasesDisease Models, AnimalTreatment OutcomeStem Cell TransplantationRegeneration

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research