Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsRetrospective StudyEurope PMCOpen access

Cell Therapy of Severe Ischemia in People with Diabetic Foot Ulcers-Do We Have Enough Evidence?

Dubský M., Husáková J., Sojáková D., Fejfarová V., Jude EB.

Retrospective Study with a reported sample of 1700 on Diabetic Foot, published in Mol Diagn Ther (2023) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Retrospective Study
Journal
Mol Diagn Ther (2023)
Reported sample size
1700
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
37740111
PMCID
PMC10590286
DOI
10.1007/s40291-023-00667-w
Citations
5

Abstract (original English)

This current opinion article critically evaluates the efficacy of autologous cell therapy (ACT) for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI), especially in people with diabetes who are not candidates for standard revascularization. This treatment approach has been used in 'no-option' CLTI in the last two decades and more than 1700 patients have received ACT worldwide. Here we analyze the level of published evidence of ACT as well as our experience with this treatment method. Many studies have shown that ACT is safe and an effective method for patients with the most severe lower limb ischemia. However, some trials did not show any benefit of ACT, and there is some heterogeneity in the types of injected cells, route of administration and assessed endpoints. Nevertheless, we believe that ACT plays an important role in a comprehensive treatment of patients with diabetic foot and severe ischemia.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • Without an adequate control group, treatment effects cannot be separated from other factors.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence
HumansDiabetic FootIschemiaDiabetes MellitusTreatment OutcomeRisk FactorsRetrospective StudiesCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyAmputation, Surgical

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research