Combined therapy of photobiomodulation and adipose-derived stem cells synergistically improve healing in an ischemic, infected and delayed healing wound model in rats with type 1 diabetes mellitus.
Ebrahimpour-Malekshah R., Amini A., Zare F., Mostafavinia A., Davoody S., Deravi N.
Randomized Controlled Trial with a reported sample of 6 on Type 1 Diabetes, Chronic Wound, Chronic Inflammation, published in BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care (2020) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Randomized Controlled Trial
- Journal
- BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care (2020)
- Country
- England
- Reported sample size
- 6
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 32098898
- PMCID
- PMC7206914
- DOI
- 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-001033
- Citations
- 38
Abstract (original English)
Objective We assessed the therapeutic effects of photobiomodulation (PBM) and adipose-derived stem cell (ADS) treatments individually and together on the maturation step of repairing of a delayed healing wound model in rats with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM1). Research design and methods We randomly assigned 24 rats with DM1 to four groups (n=6 per group). Group 1 was the control (placebo) group. In group 2, allograft human ADSs were transplanted. Group 3 was subjected to PBM (wavelength: 890 nm, peak power output: 80 W, pulse frequency: 80 Hz, pulsed duration: 180 ns, duration of exposure for each point: 200 s, power density: 0.001 W/cm 2 , energy density: 0.2 J/cm 2 ) immediately after surgery, which continued for 6 days per week for 16 days. Group 4 received both the human ADS and PBM. In addition, we inflicted an ischemic, delayed healing, and infected wound simulation in all of the rats. The wounds were infected with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Results All three treatment regimens significantly decreased the amount of microbial flora, significantly increased wound strength and significantly modulated inflammatory response and significantly increased angiogenesis on day 16. Microbiological analysis showed that PBM+ADS was significantly better than PBM and ADS alone. In terms of wound closure rate and angiogenesis, PBM+ADS was significantly better tha
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
Evidence level
Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.
Related research
- Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Transforming hypoglycemia prediction in adult type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis for precision care
Meta-analysis on Type 1 Diabetes, published in Open Life Sci (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Open Life Sci - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Long-term storage, cryopreservation, and culture of isolated human islets: a systematic review
Systematic Review on Type 1 Diabetes, published in Front Transplant (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
Front Transplant - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Change in Viability and Function of Pancreatic Islets after Coculture with Mesenchymal Stromal Cells: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis
Meta-analysis on Type 1 Diabetes, published in J Diabetes Res (2020) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2020
J Diabetes Res7 citations - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Stem cell therapy for patients with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of metabolomics-based risks and benefits
Meta-analysis on Type 1 Diabetes, Type 2 Diabetes, published in Stem Cell Investig (2018) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2018
Stem Cell Investig22 citations - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Clinical Efficacy of Stem Cell Therapy for Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis
Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 524 on Type 1 Diabetes, published in PLoS One (2016) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2016
- n = 524
PLoS One81 citations - Level BClinical TrialEurope PMC
Stem Cell-Derived Beta-Cell Therapies: Encapsulation Advances and Immunological Hurdles in Diabetes Treatment
Clinical Trial on Type 1 Diabetes, Type 2 Diabetes, Scar, published in Cells (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Cells1 citations