Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyPubMed

A comparative assessment of cartilage and joint fat pad as a potential source of cells for autologous therapy development in knee osteoarthritis.

English A., Jones EA., Corscadden D., Henshaw K., Chapman T., Emery P.

Laboratory Study with a reported sample of 26 on Knee Osteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis, Cartilage Damage, published in Rheumatology (Oxford) (2007) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Rheumatology (Oxford) (2007)
Country
England
Reported sample size
26
Source database
PubMed
PMID
17901063
DOI
10.1093/rheumatology/kem217

Abstract (original English)

The utility of autologous chondrocytes for cartilage repair strategies in older subjects with osteoarthritis (OA) may be limited by both age-related and disease-associated decline in chondrogenesis. The aim of this work was to assess OA Hoffa's fat pad as an alternative source of autologous chondroprogenitor cells and to compare it with OA chondrocytes derived from different areas of cartilage. Cartilage and fat pad tissue digests were obtained from 26 subjects with knee OA and compared with normal bone marrow (BM) mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) with respect to their in vitro colony-forming potential, growth kinetics, multipotentiality and clonogenicity. Flow cytometry was used to investigate their MSC marker phenotype. Expanded cultures derived from eroded areas of cartilage were slightly more chondrogenic than those derived from macroscopically normal cartilage or chondro-osteophytes; however, all cartilage-derived cultures failed to maintain their chondrogenic potency following extended expansion. In contrast, OA fat pads contained highly clonogenic and multipotential cells with stable chondrogenic potency in vitro, even after 16 population doublings. Standard colony-forming assays failed to reflect the observed functional differences between the studied tissues whereas flow cytometry revealed higher levels of a putative MSC marker low-affinity growth factor receptor (LNGFR)

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueAdultAgedCartilage, ArticularCell ProliferationCells, CulturedChondrocytesChondrogenesisColony-Forming Units AssayHumans

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research