Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyPubMedOpen access

Comparative regenerative mechanisms of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell- and conditioned medium-loaded three-dimensional bioprinted hydrogels in chronic diabetic wounds.

Wang L., Li X., Zhang X., Chu Q., Ye L., Jin T.

Laboratory Study on Diabetic Foot, Immune Modulation, published in Regen Biomater (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Regen Biomater (2026)
Country
England
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
42333383
PMCID
PMC13283645
DOI
10.1093/rb/rbag095

Abstract (original English)

Chronic diabetic wounds remain a major clinical challenge owing to impaired angiogenesis, persistent inflammation and cellular dysfunction. In this study, we developed a bioadhesive composite hydrogel scaffold (gelatin methacryloyl/alginate methacrylate [GA]) fabricated using digital light processing three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting, in which human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADSCs) or their conditioned medium (CM) was incorporated to generate 3D skin constructs, and compared the paracrine effects on skin regeneration. We characterized the microstructures of GA-ADSC and GA-CM scaffolds; profiled CM proteins and systematically compared the effects of GA-ADSCs and GA-CM on fibroblast proliferation, migration, angiogenesis and macrophage polarization in vitro . Their therapeutic efficacy was further evaluated in diabetic mouse wound models, including analyses of collagen deposition, angiogenesis and fibrosis markers. Furthermore, proteomic analysis was performed to understand the underlying mechanisms. In vitro , both GA-ADSCs and GA-CM promoted fibroblast proliferation, migration, angiogenesis and macrophage M2 polarization. Moreover, they accelerated wound closure in diabetic mice by enhancing collagen deposition and neovascularization (CD31) and suppressing α-smooth muscle actin and transforming growth factor-β1 expression. Notably, GA-ADSCs showed prolonged cell

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research