Level A· Stronger Clinical EvidenceRandomized Controlled TrialPubMed

Darvadstrocel in Patients With Crohn's Disease With Complex Perianal Fistulas: The ADMIRE CD II Phase 3 Randomized Trial.

Colombel JF., Garcia Olmo D., Chen ST., Serclova Z., Schwartz DA., Wexner SD.

Randomized Controlled Trial with a reported sample of 283 on Autoimmune Research, published in Gastroenterology (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level A· Stronger Clinical EvidenceEvidence level of this study

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal
Gastroenterology (2026)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
283
Source database
PubMed
PMID
41790076
DOI
10.1053/j.gastro.2025.12.033
NCT
NCT03279081
Citations
3

Abstract (original English)

Background & aims The ADMIRE CD trial demonstrated the efficacy and safety of darvadstrocel in patients with complex perianal fistulas from Europe and Israel. The efficacy and safety of darvadstrocel in an expanded patient population was investigated. Methods ADMIRE CD II (ClinicalTrials.gov, Number: NCT03279081) was a phase 3, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial conducted in Europe, Israel, and North America. Adults with Crohn's disease and complex perianal fistulas with ≤2 internal openings and ≤3 external openings and inadequate response to immunosuppressive agents or biologics were randomized 1:1 to receive darvadstrocel (a dispersion of 120 × 10 6 stem cells in 24 mL sterile buffered solution) or placebo. Both groups underwent curettage and closure of the internal opening. The primary endpoint was combined remission (closure of all treated external openings and absence of collections >2 cm) at week 24. Results Overall, 568 patients were randomized to receive darvadstrocel (n = 283) or placebo (n = 285); 249 and 246, respectively, completed the trial. At week 24, combined remission was achieved in 138 of 283 (48.8%) patients in the darvadstrocel group and 132 of 285 (46.3%) in the placebo group (estimated treatment difference: 2.4%; 95% CI, -5.8 to 10.6; P = .571). There were no significant differences in key secondary endpoints for darvadstrocel vs placebo (

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

How we grade evidence
HumansDouble-Blind MethodCrohn DiseaseFemaleAdultMaleRectal FistulaTreatment OutcomeRemission InductionMiddle Aged

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research