SVF
Level A· Stronger Clinical EvidenceSystematic Review

Efficacy of Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Stromal Vascular Fraction Alone and Combined to Biomaterials in Tendinopathy or Tendon Injury: Systematic Review of Current Concepts.

Senesi L., De Francesco F., Marchesini A., Pangrazi PP., Bertolini M., Riccio V.

Systematic Review on Tendon Injury, Scar, published in Medicina (Kaunas) (2023) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Systematic Review
Journal
Medicina (Kaunas) (2023)
Country
Switzerland
Reported sample size
—
PMID
36837474
DOI
10.3390/medicina59020273

Abstract (original English)

Background and Objectives: Tendon injury and tendinopathy are among the most frequent musculoskeletal diseases and represent a challenging issue for surgeons as well as a great socio-economic global burden. Despite the current treatments available, either surgical or conservative, the tendon healing process is often suboptimal and impaired. This is due to the inherent scarce ability of tendon tissue to repair and return itself to the original structure. Recently, Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADSC) and stromal vascular fraction (SVF) have gained a central interest in the scientific community, demonstrating their effectiveness in treatments of acute and chronic tendon disorders in animals and humans. Either enzymatic or mechanical procedures to obtain ADSC and SVF have been described and used in current clinical practice. However, no unified protocols and processes have been established. Materials and Methods: This systematic review aims at providing a comprehensive update of the literature on the clinical application of ADSC enzymatically or mechanically processed to obtain SVF, alone and in association with biomaterials in the local treatment of tendinopathy and tendon injury in vivo, in animal models and humans. The study was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Results: Thirty-two articles met our i

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

How we grade evidence
AnimalsHumansStromal Vascular FractionBiocompatible MaterialsMesenchymal Stem CellsTendinopathyTendons
Tendon InjuryScar
View on PubMedDOI

Related research