Evaluation of ChatGPT-5 responses to patient-centered questions on stromal vascular fraction for knee osteoarthritis: fair to good quality and content.
Mercan N., Eravsar E., Ergi̇n M., Çatal T., Çi̇ftci̇ S., Akkaya M.
Prospective Study on Knee Osteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis, published in BMC Musculoskelet Disord (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Prospective Study
- Journal
- BMC Musculoskelet Disord (2026)
- Country
- England
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 41832448
- PMCID
- PMC13104398
- DOI
- 10.1186/s12891-026-09731-y
Abstract (original English)
BACKGROUND: The global burden of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (KOA) continues to grow, driving clinical interest in biological treatment options. Stromal vascular fraction (SVF), derived from adipose tissue, has gained attention as a potential therapy for KOA. As patients increasingly utilize large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT for health information, this study aimed to evaluate the patient-information quality and readability of AI-generated responses to a curated set of patient-centered questions on SVF therapy for KOA. METHODS: Thirty patient-centered questions were developed through literature review by two experts and then posed to ChatGPT-5 after asking it to answer from an orthopaedic specialist perspective. Responses from ChatGPT-5 were evaluated by four orthopaedic specialists using three quality instruments: DISCERN, NLAT-AI (assessing five domains: Accuracy, Safety, Appropriateness, Actionability, and Effectiveness), and the Mika et al. scoring system. Readability was assessed using five standard metrics. RESULTS: Mean scores were as follows: DISCERN 44.61 ± 4.94 (Fair); for NLAT-AI domains, Accuracy 3.92 ± 0.50 (Good), Safety 3.23 ± 0.78 (Fair), Appropriateness 4.14 ± 0.32 (Good), Actionability 3.20 ± 0.67 (Fair), and Effectiveness 4.46 ± 0.35 (Excellent); NLAT-AI (Total/ sum of five domains) 18.95 ± 1.93 (Good); Mika et al. 2.45 ± 0.49 (Fair). Readability
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
Evidence level
Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.
Related research
- Level AMeta-analysisPubMed
Clinical Outcomes of Biologic Therapies for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Studies With ≥12-Month Follow-up.
Meta-analysis on Knee Osteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis, published in Mod Rheumatol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Mod Rheumatol - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Towards optimized rehabilitation with regenerative therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effects of cell-based injections for knee osteoarthritis
Meta-analysis on Knee Osteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis, published in Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc - Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Intra-articular fat grafting for pain relief and functioning improvement in patients with knee osteoarthritis: systematic review.
Systematic Review on Knee Osteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis, published in Disabil Rehabil (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Disabil Rehabil - Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Research Landscape of Stem Cell Applications in Musculoskeletal Tissue: A Scoping Review.
Systematic Review on Knee Osteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis, published in Cells (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Cells - Level AMeta-analysisPubMed
Comparative efficacy of different doses of mesenchymal stem cells derived from different tissue sources for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 602 on Knee Osteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis, Chronic Inflammation, Immune Modulation, published in PeerJ (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 602
PeerJ - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Influence of platelet-rich plasma composition on pain and functional performance in knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 5251 on Knee Osteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis, published in Knee Surg Relat Res (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 5251
Knee Surg Relat Res