Evidence-based guidelines on orthobiologics
Winkler T., Oehme S., Hildebrandt A., Paolucci A., Pichler L.
Randomized Controlled Trial on Knee Osteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis, Ankle Injury, published in EFORT Open Rev (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Randomized Controlled Trial
- Journal
- EFORT Open Rev (2025)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 40459170
- PMCID
- PMC12139597
- DOI
- 10.1530/eor-2025-0069
Abstract (original English)
Orthobiologics (OBs) have seen a constant increase in the number of available therapies and their clinical applications. Existing therapies can be categorized into blood-based (e.g., platelet-rich plasma (PRP)) and tissue/cell-based (e.g. mesenchymal stromal cells) approaches. While the popularity of OBs continues to grow, their diverse natures create unique challenges for the establishment of evidence-based guidelines. PRP has been reported by meta-analyses to increase patient-reported outcomes for conditions such as knee osteoarthritis (KOA), lateral epicondylitis and plantar fasciitis. However, the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) included often exhibit a high risk of bias due to the heterogeneity in the PRP preparation protocols and accompanying measures as well as inconsistent trial quality. The development pipeline of cell/tissue-based therapies is typically longer and more cost-intensive than that of blood-based therapies. Nevertheless, several products have demonstrated clinical safety. While some RCTs and meta-analyses on the outcome of cell/tissue-based therapies exist, their number is considerably lower than that of blood-based therapies and they focus mainly on KOA, with limited evidence on other orthopedic indications. Orthopedic societies such as ESSKA and AAOS have taken on the challenge of developing guidelines for OBs by combining high-level synthesized evid
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
Evidence level
Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.
Related research
- Level AMeta-analysisPubMed
Clinical Outcomes of Biologic Therapies for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Studies With ≥12-Month Follow-up.
Meta-analysis on Knee Osteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis, published in Mod Rheumatol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Mod Rheumatol - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Towards optimized rehabilitation with regenerative therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effects of cell-based injections for knee osteoarthritis
Meta-analysis on Knee Osteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis, published in Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc - Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Intra-articular fat grafting for pain relief and functioning improvement in patients with knee osteoarthritis: systematic review.
Systematic Review on Knee Osteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis, published in Disabil Rehabil (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Disabil Rehabil - Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Research Landscape of Stem Cell Applications in Musculoskeletal Tissue: A Scoping Review.
Systematic Review on Knee Osteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis, published in Cells (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Cells - Level AMeta-analysisPubMed
Comparative efficacy of different doses of mesenchymal stem cells derived from different tissue sources for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 602 on Knee Osteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis, Chronic Inflammation, Immune Modulation, published in PeerJ (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 602
PeerJ - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Influence of platelet-rich plasma composition on pain and functional performance in knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 5251 on Knee Osteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis, published in Knee Surg Relat Res (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 5251
Knee Surg Relat Res