Intra-Articular Hyaluronic Acid for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Umbrella Review

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

• Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
• Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
• Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
• Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
• Emerging · Emerging topic under active research

Abstract (original English)

Objective: to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of intra-articular hyaluronic acid (IAHA) in treating osteoarthritis (OA), considering innovations in formulations, comparative outcomes, and variability in guidelines. This review aims to synthesize evidence supporting the role of IAHA in multimodal treatment strategies. Materials and Methods: A general, narrative, umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses was conducted. Clinical practice recommendations and guidelines for IAHA use were also reviewed and evaluated. A comprehensive search was conducted across the main medical data sources. Inclusion criteria focused on studies evaluating the efficacy, safety, and impact of IAHA. Key outcomes included pain reduction (e.g., WOMAC, VAS), functional improvement, safety, and cost-effectiveness. Results: IAHA showed moderate efficacy in pain relief and functional improvement, especially in early-to-moderate OA. The results indicate that hybrid formulations and combination therapies show better clinical outcomes, with expanded efficacy and potential chondroprotection. However, heterogeneity between studies was noted, reflecting variability in patient populations and intervention protocols. International guidelines varied significantly, with some opposing routine use (e.g., AAOS, NICE) and others endorsing IAHA more or less conditionally (e.g., ESCEO, OAR

Evidence level

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.