Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsRetrospective StudyPubMed

Is Umbilical Cord-Derived Platelet-Rich Plasma a Valid Alternative to Conventional Orthobiologics Post-Knee Arthroscopy?

Giusti S., Cerulli S., Giacinto E., Adriani E.

Retrospective Study with a reported sample of 75 on Knee Osteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis, published in Adv Orthop (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Retrospective Study
Journal
Adv Orthop (2025)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
75
Source database
PubMed
PMID
41246053
DOI
10.1155/aort/8026214

Abstract (original English)

Orthobiologic treatments such as autologous platelet-rich plasma (A-PRP) and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are widely used for knee osteoarthritis (OA). Umbilical cord-derived PRP (UCD-PRP), with its standardized composition and high growth factor content, has emerged as a promising allogeneic alternative, though comparative data are limited. To compare the short-term clinical outcomes of UCD-PRP versus adipose tissue-derived MSCs (ADT-MSCs) following debridement and lavage arthroscopy in patients with early-stage knee OA. Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. This retrospective study included 225 patients with Kellgren-Lawrence grade I-II knee OA treated with either UCD-PRP ( n = 75) or ADT-MSCs ( n = 150) after arthroscopy. Outcomes assessed at baseline, 6, and 12 months included the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain. Multivariate analysis assessed predictors of outcome. Both groups showed significant functional and pain improvements from baseline at all follow-up points. The UCD-PRP group demonstrated superior pain reduction on VAS at 3 and 6 months compared with ADT-MSCs (ΔVAS at 3 months, p = 0.042; at 6 months, p = 0.0065). Functional scores (WOMAC, KOOS, and IKDC) showed no significant bet

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • Without an adequate control group, treatment effects cannot be separated from other factors.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research