Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Mesenchymal Stem Cells Regenerate Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Review Article

Verdi J., Shirian S., Saleh M., Khadem Haghighian H., Kavianpour M.

Narrative Review on Diabetic Foot, published in World J Plast Surg (2022) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
World J Plast Surg (2022)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
35592239
PMCID
PMC9018029
DOI
10.52547/wjps.11.1.12
Citations
12

Abstract (original English)

Background Diabetes is one of the metabolic diseases characterized by hyperglycemia, with many complications. Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is a significant complication of diabetes. Various therapy procedures have been recently described for DFU improvement. Methods Using PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, and Google Scholar to discover the therapeutic effects of bee products, this review study was conducted in 2018-2019 by searching PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, and Google Scholar databases. Results Cell therapies with various cell candidates such as mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are increasingly introduced into routine medical care to manage skin wounds. The applying of these cells for tissue regeneration was initially based on the capability of MSCs to differentiate into specialized cells within the injured tissue. Paracrine signaling and differentiation mechanisms have both been contributed to improving tissue repair by MCSs. However, the role of MSCs differentiation is less due to the poor survival of these cells at the site of injury. Conclusion At the same time, paracrine signaling or their secretome is the primary mechanism of MSCs that stimulate neovascularization and re-epithelialization and mobilization of inhabitant stem cells. In this review study, we discuss the role of MSCs and their secretome that can improve the use of this new approach in treating ulcers and DFU.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research