Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

Photobiomodulation preconditioned diabetic adipose derived stem cells with additional photobiomodulation: an additive approach for enhanced wound healing in diabetic rats with a delayed healing wound.

Vatandoust D., Ahmadi H., Amini A., Mostafavinia A., Fathabady FF., Moradi A.

Animal Study on Type 1 Diabetes, Chronic Wound, published in Lasers Med Sci (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Lasers Med Sci (2024)
Country
England
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
38438583
DOI
10.1007/s10103-024-04034-x
Citations
4

Abstract (original English)

In this preclinical investigation, we examined the effects of combining preconditioned diabetic adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (AD-MSCs) and photobiomodulation (PBM) on a model of infected ischemic delayed healing wound (injury), (IIDHWM) in rats with type I diabetes (TIDM). During the stages of wound healing, we examined multiple elements such as stereology, macrophage polarization, and the mRNA expression levels of stromal cell-derived factor (SDF)-1α, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), hypoxia-induced factor 1α (HIF-1α), and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) to evaluate proliferation and inflammation. The rats were grouped into: (1) control group; (2) diabetic-stem cells were transversed into the injury site; (3) diabetic-stem cells were transversed into the injury site then the injury site exposed to PBM; (4) diabetic stem cells were preconditioned with PBM and implanted into the wound; (5) diabetic stem cells were preconditioned with PBM and transferred into the injury site, then the injury site exposed additional PBM. While on both days 4, and 8, there were advanced histological consequences in groups 2-5 than in group 1, we found better results in groups 3-5 than in group 2 (p < 0.05). M1 macrophages in groups 2-5 were lower than in group 1, while groups 3-5 were reduced than in group 2 (p < 0.01). M2 macrophages in groups 2-5 were greater than in gro

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AnimalsRatsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor ADiabetes Mellitus, ExperimentalLow-Level Light TherapyWound HealingChemokine CXCL12Fibroblast Growth Factor 2Stem Cells

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research