Placebo response to intra-articular injections in knee osteoarthritis: magnitude, evolution over time, and influencing factors. A systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression
Previtali D., Boffa A., Di Laura Frattura G., Merli G., Filardo G.
Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 895 on Knee Osteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis, published in EFORT Open Rev (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Meta-analysis
- Journal
- EFORT Open Rev (2025)
- Reported sample size
- 895
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 41031623
- PMCID
- PMC12495556
- DOI
- 10.1530/eor-2025-0022
- Citations
- 2
Abstract (original English)
Purpose To quantify the response to intra-articular saline administration in terms of pain, function, and quality of life, with a focus on the evolution of placebo response over time and the identification of influencing factors on the placebo response to knee osteoarthritis injections. Methods After registration on PROSPERO, a systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines to identify double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised clinical trials on intra-articular knee injections for knee osteoarthritis. The placebo response was evaluated through meta-analyses of VAS pain, WOMAC, KOOS, and responder rates at 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-months on placebo arms of included trials. The evolution of placebo response over time was assessed, and meta-regression was conducted. Risk of bias and quality of evidence were assessed following Cochrane guidelines. Results From the initial 2,746 records, 73 articles on 5,895 patients were included. The meta-analysis demonstrated statistically and clinically significant improvements at the 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-ups. At the 12-month follow-up, placebo response declined and was no longer clinically significant for some sub-scores. Responder rates exceeded 50% at 1-, 3-, and 6-months. The placebo response was stronger in studies with a higher proportion of female participants and in more recently published trials. Conclusions Placebo respo
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
Evidence level
Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.
Related research
- Level AMeta-analysisPubMed
Clinical Outcomes of Biologic Therapies for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Studies With ≥12-Month Follow-up.
Meta-analysis on Knee Osteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis, published in Mod Rheumatol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Mod Rheumatol - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Towards optimized rehabilitation with regenerative therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effects of cell-based injections for knee osteoarthritis
Meta-analysis on Knee Osteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis, published in Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc - Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Intra-articular fat grafting for pain relief and functioning improvement in patients with knee osteoarthritis: systematic review.
Systematic Review on Knee Osteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis, published in Disabil Rehabil (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Disabil Rehabil - Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Research Landscape of Stem Cell Applications in Musculoskeletal Tissue: A Scoping Review.
Systematic Review on Knee Osteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis, published in Cells (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Cells - Level AMeta-analysisPubMed
Comparative efficacy of different doses of mesenchymal stem cells derived from different tissue sources for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 602 on Knee Osteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis, Chronic Inflammation, Immune Modulation, published in PeerJ (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 602
PeerJ - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Influence of platelet-rich plasma composition on pain and functional performance in knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 5251 on Knee Osteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis, published in Knee Surg Relat Res (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 5251
Knee Surg Relat Res