Level A· Stronger Clinical EvidenceMeta-analysisEurope PMCOpen access

Placebo response to intra-articular injections in knee osteoarthritis: magnitude, evolution over time, and influencing factors. A systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression

Previtali D., Boffa A., Di Laura Frattura G., Merli G., Filardo G.

Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 895 on Knee Osteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis, published in EFORT Open Rev (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level A· Stronger Clinical EvidenceEvidence level of this study

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Meta-analysis
Journal
EFORT Open Rev (2025)
Reported sample size
895
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
41031623
PMCID
PMC12495556
DOI
10.1530/eor-2025-0022
Citations
2

Abstract (original English)

Purpose To quantify the response to intra-articular saline administration in terms of pain, function, and quality of life, with a focus on the evolution of placebo response over time and the identification of influencing factors on the placebo response to knee osteoarthritis injections. Methods After registration on PROSPERO, a systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines to identify double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised clinical trials on intra-articular knee injections for knee osteoarthritis. The placebo response was evaluated through meta-analyses of VAS pain, WOMAC, KOOS, and responder rates at 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-months on placebo arms of included trials. The evolution of placebo response over time was assessed, and meta-regression was conducted. Risk of bias and quality of evidence were assessed following Cochrane guidelines. Results From the initial 2,746 records, 73 articles on 5,895 patients were included. The meta-analysis demonstrated statistically and clinically significant improvements at the 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-ups. At the 12-month follow-up, placebo response declined and was no longer clinically significant for some sub-scores. Responder rates exceeded 50% at 1-, 3-, and 6-months. The placebo response was stronger in studies with a higher proportion of female participants and in more recently published trials. Conclusions Placebo respo

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research