The Role of Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) in the Treatment of Patellofemoral Arthritis and Anterior Knee Pain: A Systematic Review

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

• Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
• Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
• Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
• Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
• Emerging · Emerging topic under active research

Abstract (original English)

Patellofemoral osteoarthritis (OA) and chondromalacia patellae (CMP) are common and disabling conditions that significantly affect physical performance and quality of life. Despite the great deal of scientific research on the subject, there is limited evidence regarding the outcome of nonoperative interventional procedures. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has demonstrated positive results for tibiofemoral knee osteoarthritis, but its role in anterior knee pain (AKP) remains unclear. The aim of this study was to review the evidence on the efficacy (clinical and radiological) and safety of PRP in patients suffering from patellofemoral OA, CMP, and AKP. Medline/Pubmed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were systematically searched up to June 2025 to identify all the available relevant studies. Five studies, including 146 patients, fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included in the systematic review. Although there was a statistically significant improvement in clinical setting, radiologic evidence of cartilage regeneration was limited and uncertain. Specifically, the pooled analysis revealed an improvement of the Visual Analogue Scale from 6.7 to 2.1 ( p p p p p < 0.001). Well-designed and appropriately powered randomized trials with imaging endpoints are needed to validate the efficacy of PRP administration in PFA, CMP, and AKP and refine patient selection criteria.

Evidence level

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.