Stem cell, Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor and/or Dihexa to promote limb function recovery in a rat sciatic nerve damage-repair model: Experimental animal studies
Weiss JB., Phillips CJ., Malin EW., Gorantla VS., Harding JW., Salgar SK.
Laboratory Study with a reported sample of 6 on Ankle & Foot, Systemic / IV, published in Ann Med Surg (Lond) (2021) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Laboratory Study
- Journal
- Ann Med Surg (Lond) (2021)
- Reported sample size
- 6
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 34703584
- PMCID
- PMC8524106
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102917
- Citations
- 1
Abstract (original English)
Background Optimizing nerve regeneration and re-innervation of target muscle/s is the key for improved functional recovery following peripheral nerve damage. We investigated whether administration of mesenchymal stem cell (MSC), Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) and/or Dihexa can improve recovery of limb function following peripheral nerve damage in rat sciatic nerve transection-repair model. Materials and methods There were 10 experimental groups (n = 6-8 rats/group). Bone marrow derived syngeneic MSCs (2 × 10 6 ; passage≤6), G-CSF (200-400 μg/kg b.wt.), Dihexa (2-4 mg/kg b.wt.) and/or Vehicle were administered to male Lewis rats locally via hydrogel at the site of nerve repair, systemically (i.v./i.p), and/or to gastrocnemius muscle. The limb sensory and motor functions were assessed at 1-2 week intervals post nerve repair until the study endpoint (16 weeks). Results The sensory function in all nerve boundaries (peroneal, tibial, sural) returned to nearly normal by 8 weeks (Grade 2.7 on a scale of Grade 0-3 [0 = No function; 3 = Normal function]) in all groups combined. The peroneal nerve function recovered quickly with return of function at one week (∼2.0) while sural nerve function recovered rather slowly at four weeks (∼1.0). Motor function at 8-16 weeks post-nerve repair as determined by walking foot print grades significantly (P Conclusions These findings dem
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.
Related research
- Level AMeta-analysisPubMed
Efficacy of Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes in Promoting Diabetic Foot Ulcer Healing: A Meta-Analysis of Preclinical Animal Studies.
Meta-analysis on Diabetic Foot, Chronic Wound, published in J Diabetes Res (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
J Diabetes Res - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells combined with intramuscular injection promote the healing of diabetic foot ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 2059 on Diabetic Foot, Chronic Wound, published in Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 2059
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Comparative efficacy of advanced therapeutic modalities for diabetic foot ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis including NPWT, stem cells, ESWT, and bioengineered treatments
Meta-analysis on Diabetic Foot, published in Front Bioeng Biotechnol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Front Bioeng Biotechnol - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Efficacy of stem cell therapy for achilles tendon rupture: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on animal studies
Meta-analysis on Tendon Injury, published in Front Bioeng Biotechnol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Front Bioeng Biotechnol - Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Cell-Based Therapies for Post-Traumatic Ankle Osteoarthritis and Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: A Systematic Scoping Review of an Emerging and Heterogeneous Evidence Base.
Systematic Review on Knee Osteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis, Cartilage Damage, Ankle Injury, published in Bioengineering (Basel) (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Bioengineering (Basel) - Level AMeta-analysisPubMed
Therapeutic potential of adipose-derived stem cells for diabetic foot ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Meta-analysis on Diabetic Foot, Chronic Wound, published in Diabetol Metab Syndr (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
Diabetol Metab Syndr6 citations