Therapeutic Effect of Stem Cells from Different Sources on Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

• Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
• Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
• Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
• Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
• Emerging · Emerging topic under active research

Abstract (original English)

AimTo evaluate the efficacy of stem cell therapy from different sources on the ankle-brachial index, wound closure percentage, and wound closure time in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs).MethodsA literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library's Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science, extending through June 29, 2023. Quality evaluation was done using the Cochrane's bias risk assessment tool (RoB 2.0). Employing a Bayesian approach, the statistical computations was executed with the JAGS software, leveraging the gemtc 0.8-2 and rjags 4-10 libraries, within the R environment 4.1.2. The included interventions came from peripheral blood, bone marrow, placenta, umbilical cord blood, adipose tissue, or others.ResultA preliminary search identified 2286 articles, of which 23 randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria and were ultimately included. The analysis findings indicated that mesenchymal stem cells derived from the umbilical cord (HUCMSCs) led to a notable enhanced the ankle-brachial index in patients with DFUs compared to standard treatment (MD: 0.2; 95% CI [0.01, 0.36]). HUCMSCs were found to be the optimal therapeutic approach for enhancing the ankle-brachial index (SUCRA = 82.7%). Research on the wound closure percentage revealed that compared to platelet-rich plasma (PRP), processed microvascular tissue (PMVT),

Evidence level

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.