Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyPubMed

Acceleration of a delayed healing wound repair model in diabetic rats by additive impacts of photobiomodulation plus conditioned medium of adipose-derived stem cells.

Asadi R., Mostafavinia A., Amini A., Ahmadi H., Ahrabi B., Omidi H.

Laboratory Study on Diabetic Foot, Chronic Wound, Chronic Inflammation, published in J Diabetes Metab Disord (2023) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
J Diabetes Metab Disord (2023)
Country
Switzerland
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
37975122
PMCID
PMC10638220
DOI
10.1007/s40200-023-01285-3
Citations
3

Abstract (original English)

Purpose This study aimed to investigate the effects of photobiomodulation (PBM) and conditioned medium (CM) derived from human adipose-derived stem cells (h-ASCs), both individually and in combination, on the maturation stage of an ischemic infected delayed healing wound model (IIDHWM) in type I diabetic (TIDM) rats. Methods The study involved the extraction of h-ASCs from donated fat, assessment of their immunophenotypic markers, cell culture, and extraction and concentration of CM from cultured 1 × 10^6 h-ASCs. TIDM was induced in 24 male adult rats, divided into four groups: control, CM group, PBM group (80 Hz, 0.2 J/cm 2 , 890 nm), and rats receiving both CM and PBM. Clinical and laboratory evaluations were conducted on days 4, 8, and 16, and euthanasia was performed using CO 2 on day 16. Tensiometrical and stereological examinations were carried out using two wound samples from each rat. Results Across all evaluated factors, including wound closure ratio, microbiological, tensiometrical, and stereological parameters, similar patterns were observed. The outcomes of CM + PBM, PBM, and CM treatments were significantly superior in all evaluated parameters compared to the control group (p = 0.000 for all). Both PBM and CM + PBM treatments showed better tensiometrical and stereological results than CM alone (almost all, p = 0.000), and CM + PBM outperformed PBM alone in almost a

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research