Level A· Stronger Clinical EvidenceSystematic ReviewEurope PMC

Acellular Scaffolds as Innovative Biomaterial Platforms for the Management of Diabetic Wounds

Tallapaneni V., Kalaivani C., Pamu D., Mude L., Singh SK., Karri VVSR.

Systematic Review on Diabetic Foot, Chronic Wound, published in Tissue Eng Regen Med (2021) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level A· Stronger Clinical EvidenceEvidence level of this study

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Systematic Review
Journal
Tissue Eng Regen Med (2021)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
34048000
PMCID
PMC8440725
DOI
10.1007/s13770-021-00344-1
Citations
11

Abstract (original English)

Diabetic wound (DW) is one of the leading complications of patients having a long history of uncontrolled diabetes. Moreover, it also imposes an economic burden on people suffering from wounds to manage the treatment. The major impending factors in the treatment of DW are infection, prolonged inflammation and decreased oxygen levels. Since these non-healing wounds are associated with an extended recovery period, the existing therapies provide treatment for a limited period only. The areas covered in this review are general sequential events of wound healing along with DW's pathophysiology, the origin of DW and success, as well as limitations of existing therapies. This systematic review's significant aspect is to highlight the fabrication, characterization and applications of various acellular scaffolds used to heal DW. In addition to that, cellular scaffolds are also described to a limited extent.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

How we grade evidence
HumansDiabetes MellitusBiocompatible MaterialsWound Healing

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research