Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewPubMed

[Advances in the research of mesenchymal stem cells in chronic wounds].

Zhao Y., Wang H., Peng Y., Peng L., Lin XY.

Narrative Review on Diabetic Foot, Chronic Wound, published in Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi (2018) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi (2018)
Country
China
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
29961299
DOI
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2018.06.023

Abstract (original English)

Skin is the largest organ in the body, with a variety of functions, such as thermoregulation, physical barriers, and sensory transmission, etc. Therefore, to restore the function after injury as soon as possible is particularly important. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are derived from mesoderm, and can differentiate into a variety of tissues, such as cartilaginous tissue, myoideum, and adipose tissue. Weak immunogenicity of MSCs make them become the ideal seed cells of tissue engineering. MSCs have a wide range of sources, including known sources of bone marrow, skin, placenta, and adipose tissue, etc. MSCs from different sources also have many different mechanisms in wound repair. This article reviews the recent researches on MSCs in the treatment of chronic wounds, so as to explore new ideas for the clinical treatment of chronic wounds.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueAnimalsBone Marrow CellsCell DifferentiationMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationMesenchymal Stem CellsSkinTissue EngineeringWound Healing

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research