Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

Analysis of Enhanced Wound Closure Potential of ADSC-derived Secretome Compared to Aquacel Extra in Diabetic Rats.

Bajuri MY., Rashidbenam Z., Mahidin MY., Law JX., Tan GC., Abdul Rani R.

Animal Study on Diabetic Foot, Chronic Wound, published in Curr Stem Cell Res Ther (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Curr Stem Cell Res Ther (2025)
Country
United Arab Emirates
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
41147070
DOI
10.2174/011574888X298502240524062950

Abstract (original English)

Diabetes Mellitus (DM) can lead to serious complications, such as Diabetic Foot Ulcers (DFUs). Currently, Aquacel Extra is one of the standard therapies for DFUs, but its efficacy has some limitations that may be overcome by alternative treatments, such as the secretome derived from adipose-derived stem cell (ADSCs). ADSC secretome has shown promising results in promoting wound healing by enhancing cell proliferation, collagen synthesis, and migration of fibroblasts. This study aims to compare the effect of the adipose-derived stem cell (ADSC) secretome to Aquacel Extra, a hydrofiber dressing containing gel- forming agents, on wound healing in a diabetic rat model. Aquacel Extra has sodium carboxymethylcellulose fibers, which contribute to its unique properties. The objective of this study is to compare the wound healing outcome of ADSC secretome and Aquacel Extra in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Sprague Dawley rats received a single intravenous administration of streptozotocin to induce diabetes mellitus (DM). A full-thickness excisional circular wound was created at the dorsum aspect of the rats two weeks after diabetic induction. Rats were randomly divided into two groups: the Aquacel Extra group, which received the hydrofiber dressing Aquacel Extra containing gel-forming agents, and the secretome group, which received the ADSC secretome on days 0, 3, and 7. The gros

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AnimalsWound HealingDiabetes Mellitus, ExperimentalRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySecretomeMaleStem CellsAdipose TissueDiabetic Foot

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research