Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsProspective StudyPubMed

Comparable Effects on Healing between Autologous Diabetic Adipose-Derived Stem Cells and Allogeneic Normal Counterparts.

Chen B., Wei Y., Cai J., Zitkovsky HS., Guo L.

Prospective Study on Diabetic Foot, Chronic Wound, published in Plast Reconstr Surg (2023) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Prospective Study
Journal
Plast Reconstr Surg (2023)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
37159907
DOI
10.1097/PRS.0000000000010647
Citations
1

Abstract (original English)

Adipose-derived stem cell (ASC) therapy is considered a promising strategy for improving impaired wound healing, especially in diabetics. Although the therapeutic potential of allogeneic ASCs from healthy donors is naturally limited, that of autologous ASCs from diabetic patients is questionable. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of diabetic ASCs in the treatment of diabetic wounds. Diabetic ASCs (DMA) and nondiabetic ASCs were isolated from db/db and C57BL/6J mice, and characterized by immunocytochemistry, proliferation, differentiation, and gene expression assays. The effects of both ASCs on healing were investigated using 36 male 10- to 12-week-old db/db mice. Wound size was measured semiweekly until day 28, and histologic and molecular analyses were performed at day 14. Both ASCs had fibroblast-like morphology and were CD44 + /CD90 + /CD34 - /CD45 - at passage 4. Compared with nondiabetic ASCs in vitro, DMA proliferative capability was restored by passage 4 ( P > 0.05). Although DMA osteogenesis was attenuated ( P < 0.01), both ASCs had similar adipogenesis and expressions of PPARγ/LPL/OCN/RUNX2 ( P > 0.05). In vivo experiments showed that, compared with phosphate-buffered saline control, both ASCs are comparable in improving wound healing ( P < 0.0001), angiogenesis ( P < 0.05), epithelial cell proliferation ( P < 0.05), and granulation tissue formation (

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence
HumansMaleMiceAnimalsAdipose TissueMice, Inbred C57BLWound HealingDiabetes MellitusHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research