Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyPubMedOpen access

Curcumin preconditioning enhances the efficacy of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells to accelerate healing of burn wounds.

Azam M., Ghufran H., Butt H., Mehmood A., Ashfaq R., Ilyas AM.

Laboratory Study with a reported sample of 6 on Diabetic Foot, Chronic Wound, Burns, published in Burns Trauma (2021) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Burns Trauma (2021)
Country
England
Reported sample size
6
Source database
PubMed
PMID
34514007
PMCID
PMC8430278
DOI
10.1093/burnst/tkab021
Citations
28

Abstract (original English)

Background Following recent findings from our group that curcumin preconditioning augments the therapeutic efficacy of adipose-derived stem cells in the healing of diabetic wounds in rats, we aimed to investigate the regenerative effects of curcumin preconditioned adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ASCs) for better recovery of acid inflicted burns in this study. Methods ASCs were preconditioned with 5 μM curcumin for 24 hours and assessed for proliferation, migration, paracrine release potential and gene expression comparative to naïve ASCs. Subsequently, the healing capacity of curcumin preconditioned ASCs (Cur-ASCs) versus naïve ASCs was examined using acidic wounds in rats. For this, acid inflicted burns of 20 mm in diameter were made on the back of male Wistar rats. Then, 2 × 10 6 cells of Cur-ASCs and naïve ASCs were intradermally injected in the wound periphery (n = 6) for comparison with an untreated saline control. Post-transplantation, wounds were macroscopically analysed and photographed to evaluate the percentage of wound closure and period of re-epithelization. Healed wound biopsies were excised and used for histological evaluation and expression analysis of wound healing markers at molecular level by quantitative PCR and western blotting. Results We found that Cur-ASCs exhibited greater proliferation, migration and paracrine potential in vitro . Further, Cur-A

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research