Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Current Therapeutic Strategies in Diabetic Foot Ulcers

Perez-Favila A., Martinez-Fierro ML., Rodriguez-Lazalde JG., Cid-Baez MA., Zamudio-Osuna MJ., Martinez-Blanco MDR.

Narrative Review on Diabetic Foot, Peripheral Artery Disease, Chronic Wound, published in Medicina (Kaunas) (2019) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Medicina (Kaunas) (2019)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
31731539
PMCID
PMC6915664
DOI
10.3390/medicina55110714
Citations
118

Abstract (original English)

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are the fastest growing chronic complication of diabetes mellitus, with more than 400 million people diagnosed globally, and the condition is responsible for lower extremity amputation in 85% of people affected, leading to high-cost hospital care and increased mortality risk. Neuropathy and peripheral arterial disease trigger deformities or trauma, and aggravating factors such as infection and edema are the etiological factors for the development of DFUs. DFUs require identifying the etiology and assessing the co-morbidities to provide the correct therapeutic approach, essential to reducing lower-extremity amputation risk. This review focuses on the current treatment strategies for DFUs with a special emphasis on tissue engineering techniques and regenerative medicine that collectively target all components of chronic wound pathology.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
HumansPeripheral Nervous System DiseasesDiabetic FootSkin DiseasesDiabetes MellitusDiabetes ComplicationsDebridementLaser Therapy

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research