Darvadstrocel for complex perianal fistulas in Crohn's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

• Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
• Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
• Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
• Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
• Emerging · Emerging topic under active research

Abstract (original English)

Background Local injection of darvadstrocel, a suspension of expanded adipose-derived allogenic mesenchymal stem cells, has been used for treatment-refractory perianal fistulas in Crohn's disease (CD). Objective This study aimed to investigate efficacy and safety of darvadstrocel for complex perianal fistulas in CD. Methods A systematic search was conducted through April 2024 in relevant databases for observational studies evaluating darvadstrocel. A random-effects meta-analysis model was used to calculate the pooled effect sizes (proportions or incidence rates [IRs]) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of effectiveness and safety outcomes. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tool. The I 2 value assessed heterogeneity. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were also conducted. Results Twelve studies were included with 595 patients. The pooled rate of patients achieving clinical remission, defined as fistula healing, was 68.1% at month 6 (95% CI 63.4-72.7) and 77.2% (95% CI 70.1-83.8) at month 12. Combined remission, defined as clinical remission and absence of collections >2 cm confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging, was reported in 60.6% and in 69.7% of patients at months 6 and 12, respectively. The rate of patients with treatment failure, defined as no clinical remission at the last follow-up (mean 18.7 months; SD 9.9), was 34.5%.

Evidence level

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.