Efficacy of mesenchymal stem cell-based therapies in the treatment of perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

• Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
• Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
• Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
• Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
• Emerging · Emerging topic under active research

Abstract (original English)

Background Perianal lesions of Crohn's disease (CD) are complex and disabling conditions. Mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-based therapies have emerged as an innovative approach in managing refractory perianal fistulizing CD. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to describe and compare combined remission and clinical outcomes of MSC-based therapies, and then whether one approach stands out from the rest. Methods We searched in MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL (up to December 31, 2023) all prospective studies assessing a local injection of MSC-based therapy in perianal fistulas of CD. The primary outcome was achievement of combined remission. MSC-based therapy strategies were compared. Results Twenty-five studies were included in the meta-analysis, enrolling 596 patients with perianal fistulizing CD. The combined remission rate at 3, 6 and 12 months were 36.2% (95% confidence interval (CI), 24.5-49.7), 57.9% (95% CI 51.3-64.2) and 52% (95% CI 38.8-64.8), respectively. MSC-based therapies demonstrated a significant effect in achieving combined remission compared to placebo at 3 months (relative risk (RR) = 1.6; 95% CI 1.0-2.8) and at 6 months (RR = 1.5; 95% CI 1.1-1.9). At 6 months, the combined remission rate was 57.2% (95% CI 47.2-66.6) for adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) and 55.7% (95% CI 26.4-81.5) for bone marrow-derived stem cells (BMSCs). In the network meta-analysis

Evidence level

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.