Fat grafting and platelet-rich plasma for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: A feasibility-randomised controlled trial.
Smith OJ., Leigh R., Kanapathy M., Macneal P., Jell G., Hachach-Haram N.
Randomized Controlled Trial with a reported sample of 32 on Diabetic Foot, Chronic Wound, published in Int Wound J (2020) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Randomized Controlled Trial
- Journal
- Int Wound J (2020)
- Country
- England
- Reported sample size
- 32
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 32633854
- PMCID
- PMC7949265
- DOI
- 10.1111/iwj.13433
- NCT
- NCT03085550
- Citations
- 50
Abstract (original English)
Chronic, nonhealing diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) are increasing in prevalence and are often unresponsive to conventional therapy. Adipose tissue, containing adipose-derived stem cells, and platelet rich plasma (PRP) are regenerative therapies rich in growth factors which may provide a solution to chronic wound healing. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of conducting a definitive randomised controlled trial (RCT) to investigate the efficacy of these therapies for the treatment of DFU. This was a single centre, feasibility, three-arm, parallel group RCT. Eligible DFU patients were randomised on a 1:1:1 basis to three intervention arms: control (podiatry); fat grafting; fat grafting with PRP. The intervention was delivered once and patients were followed-up for 12 weeks. The primary objective was to assess measures of trial feasibility. Clinical outcomes and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were also evaluated. Three hundred and thirty four patients were screened and 32 patients (9.6%) were deemed eligible with 18 enrolled in the trial (6 per arm) over 17 months. All participants completed the trial with no withdrawals or crossover. Participant engagement was high with most HRQoL questionnaires returned and only 4.8% follow-up appointments missed. There were five adverse events (AEs) related to the trial with no serious AEs. Five (28%) of the wounds healed. There was
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
Evidence level
Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.
Related research
- Level AMeta-analysisPubMed
Efficacy of Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes in Promoting Diabetic Foot Ulcer Healing: A Meta-Analysis of Preclinical Animal Studies.
Meta-analysis on Diabetic Foot, Chronic Wound, published in J Diabetes Res (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
J Diabetes Res - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells combined with intramuscular injection promote the healing of diabetic foot ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 2059 on Diabetic Foot, Chronic Wound, published in Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 2059
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Comparative efficacy of advanced therapeutic modalities for diabetic foot ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis including NPWT, stem cells, ESWT, and bioengineered treatments
Meta-analysis on Diabetic Foot, published in Front Bioeng Biotechnol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Front Bioeng Biotechnol - Level AMeta-analysisPubMed
Therapeutic potential of adipose-derived stem cells for diabetic foot ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Meta-analysis on Diabetic Foot, Chronic Wound, published in Diabetol Metab Syndr (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
Diabetol Metab Syndr6 citations - Level AMeta-analysisPubMed
A meta-analysis on application and prospect of cell therapy in the treatment of diabetes mellitus.
Meta-analysis on Diabetic Foot, Autoimmune Research, published in Stem Cell Res Ther (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
Stem Cell Res Ther - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Comparison of the efficacy of 12 interventions in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: a network meta-analysis
Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 356 on Diabetic Foot, Chronic Wound, published in PeerJ (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
- n = 356
PeerJ1 citations