Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewPubMed

Healing from Within: Regenerative Medicine in Pain Therapy.

Loffredo AJ., Chang Chien GC., Pangarkar SS.

Narrative Review on Knee Osteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis, Chronic Inflammation, published in Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am (2026)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
42379698
DOI
10.1016/j.pmr.2026.03.011

Abstract (original English)

This article reviews 6 categories of regenerative therapies for chronic pain, including cell-based therapies, biologics, gene therapy, exosomes, tissue engineering, and biophysical stimuli. While mesenchymal stem cells, bone marrow aspirate concentrate, and adipose-derived stem cells show promise for mild conditions like knee osteoarthritis and lateral epicondylitis, no regenerative therapy is Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved for chronic pain. Platelet-rich plasma and autologous conditioned serum are not FDA-approved as stand-alone treatments. Clinical guidance includes holding nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, avoiding cytotoxic anesthetics, and managing expectations. The article highlights legal risks related to biologics and stresses need for standardized protocols and high-quality trials.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
HumansRegenerative MedicineChronic PainGenetic TherapyPain ManagementTissue EngineeringPlatelet-Rich Plasma

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research