The Immune-Centric Revolution Translated into Clinical Application: Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cell (PBMNC) Therapy in Diabetic Patients with No-Option Critical Limb-Threatening Ischemia (NO-CLTI)-Rationale and Meta-An

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

• Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
• Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
• Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
• Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
• Emerging · Emerging topic under active research

Abstract (original English)

Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI), the most advanced form of peripheral arterial disease (PAD), is the comorbidity primarily responsible for major lower-limb amputations, particularly for diabetic patients. Autologous cell therapy has been the focus of efforts over the past 20 years to create non-interventional therapeutic options for no-option CLTI to improve limb perfusion and wound healing. Among the different available techniques, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNC) appear to be the most promising autologous cell therapy due to physio-pathological considerations and clinical evidence, which will be discussed in this review. A meta-analysis of six clinical studies, including 256 diabetic patients treated with naive, fresh PBMNC produced via a selective filtration point-of-care device, was conducted. PBMNC was associated with a mean yearly amputation rate of 15.7%, a mean healing rate of 62%, and a time to healing of 208.6 ± 136.5 days. Moreover, an increase in TcPO2 and a reduction in pain were observed. All-cause mortality, with a mean rate of 22.2% and a yearly mortality rate of 18.8%, was reported. No serious adverse events were reported. Finally, some practical and financial considerations are provided, which point to the therapy's recommendation as the first line of treatment for this particular and crucial patient group.

Evidence level

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.