Impacts of stem cells from different sources on wound healing rate in diabetic foot ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

• Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
• Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
• Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
• Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
• Emerging · Emerging topic under active research

Abstract (original English)

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) are a significant complication of diabetes, with huge implications on patient morbidity and healthcare costs. The objective of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the impacts of stem cells from different sources on wound healing rate in DFU patients. We systematically retrieved records via key databases PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Wanfang from the inception to October 2024. The Stata 16.0 (Stata Corp, TX) software was used to perform the meta-analysis. Risk of bias in all included studies was evaluated by Cochrane Risk of Bias version 2. A total of 24 studies involving 1,321 patients were included. There was an increased likelihood of wound healing with peripheral blood-derived stem cells, the most effective cells (odds ratios (OR) = 7.31, 95% CI: 2.90-18.47), followed by adipose-derived stem cells (OR = 5.23, 95% CI: 2.76-9.90), umbilical cord-derived stem cells (OR = 4.94, 95% CI: 0.61-40.03), bone-derived stem cells (OR = 4.36, 95% CI: 2.43-7.85) and other sources stem cells (OR = 3.16, 95% CI: 1.83-5.45). Nevertheless, only umbilical cord-derived stem cells showed statistical significance (p < 0.05). The heterogeneity ranged from non-existent in the adipose and peripheral blood groups (I 2 = 0.00%) to moderate in the bone groups (I 2 = 26.31%) and other groups (I 2 = 30.62%),

Evidence level

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.