Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

Photobiomodulation, alone or combined with adipose-derived stem cells, reduces inflammation by modulation of microRNA-146a and interleukin-1ß in a delayed-healing infected wound in diabetic rats.

Moravej FG., Amini A., Masteri Farahani R., Mohammadi-Yeganeh S., Mostafavinia A., Ahmadi H.

Animal Study on Diabetic Foot, Chronic Wound, Chronic Inflammation, published in Lasers Med Sci (2023) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Lasers Med Sci (2023)
Country
England
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
37243832
DOI
10.1007/s10103-023-03786-2
Citations
13

Abstract (original English)

Diabetic wounds are categorized by chronic inflammation, leading to the development of diabetic foot ulcers, which cause amputation and death. Herewith, we examined the effect of photobiomodulation (PBM) plus allogeneic diabetic adipose tissue-derived stem cells (ad-ADS) on stereological parameters and expression levels of interleukin (IL)-1ß and microRNA (miRNA)-146a in the inflammatory (day 4) and proliferation (day 8) stages of wound healing in an ischemic infected (with 2×10 7 colony-forming units of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) delayed healing wound model (IIDHWM) in type I diabetic (TIDM) rats. There were five groups of rats: group 1 control (C); group 2 (CELL) in which rat wounds received 1×10 6 ad-ADS; group 3 (CL) in which rat wounds received the ad-ADS and were subsequently exposed to PBM(890 nm, 80 Hz, 3.5 J/cm 2 , in vivo); group 4 (CP) in which the ad-ADS preconditioned by the PBM(630 nm + 810 nm, 0.05 W, 1.2 J/cm 2 , 3 times) were implanted into rat wounds; group 5 (CLP) in which the PBM preconditioned ad-ADS were implanted into rat wounds, which were then exposed to PBM. On both days, significantly better histological results were seen in all experimental groups except control. Significantly better histological results were observed in the ad-ADS plus PBM treatment correlated to the ad-ADS alone group (p<0.05). Overall, PBM preconditioned ad-ADS f

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
RatsAnimalsDiabetes Mellitus, ExperimentalRats, WistarMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusWound HealingStem CellsInflammationLow-Level Light TherapyMicroRNAs

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research