Preclinical Therapeutic Efficacy of Extracellular Vesicles Derived from Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stromal/Stem Cells in Diabetic Wounds: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

• Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
• Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
• Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
• Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
• Emerging · Emerging topic under active research

Abstract (original English)

Extracellular vesicles isolated from adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (ADSC-EVs) have demonstrated promising potential in wound healing treatment. To determine the therapeutic efficacy of ADSC-EVs for diabetic wounds in preclinical models, we performed a meta-analysis of available studies. PubMed and Embase were searched (to April 23, 2023). All full-text articles describing the therapeutic application of ADSC-EVs in diabetic wounds were included. Study outcomes were pooled using a random effects meta-analysis, including wound closure, angiogenesis, and collagen deposition. Other outcomes were only discussed descriptively. Seventy unique records were identified from our search; 20 full-text articles were included for qualitative analysis. Twelve studies were eligible for quantitative meta-analysis. The results showed that ADSC-EVs accelerated diabetic wound healing compared to controls with a large effect (standardized mean difference (SMD) 4.22, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.07 to 5.36). The administration of ADSC-EVs also improved neovascularization (SMD 9.27, 95% CI 4.70 to 13.83) and collagen deposition (SMD 2.19, 95% CI 0.94 to 3.44), with a large effect. The risk of bias was unclear in all included studies. Conclusively, ADSC-EV is an effective treatment for diabetic wounds in preclinical trials, and it appears justified for transfer into the clinica

Evidence level

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.