Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewPubMedOpen access

Regenerative potential of PRP-based scaffolds in chronic wound healing: Mechanisms, advances, and therapeutic insights.

Altalbawy FMA., Mukhlif BAM., Hussen A., Mohammed JS., S RJ., Singh A.

Narrative Review on Diabetic Foot, Chronic Wound, published in Regen Ther (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Regen Ther (2025)
Country
Netherlands
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
40654520
PMCID
PMC12246585
DOI
10.1016/j.reth.2025.06.008
Citations
5

Abstract (original English)

Introduction Chronic wounds such as diabetic foot ulcers, venous leg ulcers, and pressure ulcers often remain trapped in the inflammatory phase due to oxidative stress, protease overactivity, and impaired cellular responses, particularly in diabetic conditions. These wounds require advanced therapeutic strategies beyond conventional care. Regenerative medicine-especially platelet-rich plasma (PRP)-based interventions-has emerged as a promising approach for enhancing wound repair. Methods This review examines recent developments in PRP-loaded scaffolds, focusing on their biological mechanisms, structural advantages, and clinical applications. It synthesizes findings from key studies that integrate PRP with natural and synthetic biomaterials, often combined with bioactive agents like adipose-derived stem cell exosomes. Results PRP-containing scaffolds promote wound healing through multiple pathways: enhancing cell proliferation, migration, angiogenesis, and extracellular matrix remodeling; reducing inflammation via M2 macrophage polarization; and facilitating collagen deposition. Their antibacterial properties and controlled release of growth factors such as VEGF and TGF-β1 further support tissue regeneration. Additionally, scaffold composition improves mechanical strength, elasticity, and growth factor bioavailability. Innovations such as GelMA/SFMA hydrogels and COL/PRP-ADSC-ex

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research