Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyEurope PMCOpen access

RNA modifications: molecular orchestrators of wound healing

Guo X., Liu L., Yang J., Dai Y., Zhang Q., Gu R.

Animal Study on Diabetic Foot, Chronic Wound, Burns, published in Burns Trauma (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Burns Trauma (2026)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
41878560
PMCID
PMC13007601
DOI
10.1093/burnst/tkag010

Abstract (original English)

Wound healing is a highly coordinated biological process traditionally divided into three phases: inflammatory, proliferative, and remodeling. Diabetes and acute trauma markedly disrupt these stages, resulting in delayed wound closure, persistent inflammation, and impaired tissue regeneration. This review focuses on three trauma-relevant contexts: (i) skin wounds, including diabetic ulcers and burns; (ii) bone fracture healing; and (iii) corneal epithelial and stromal injury. Robust in vivo evidence is synthesized to delineate the mechanistic roles of the four principal ribonucleic acid (RNA) modifications: N 6 -methyladenosine, 5-methylcytosine, N 7 -methylguanosine, and N 4 -acetylcytidine. Additionally, the roles of RNA modification writers, erasers, and readers in regulating macrophage polarization, stem and progenitor cell fate, angiogenesis, lymphangiogenesis, and extracellular matrix remodeling are examined. Evidence across different tissues and wound healing phases is integrated rather than presented descriptively. Methodological limitations are highlighted, and knowledge gaps are identified alongside testable hypotheses. Translational opportunities with direct relevance to burn and trauma management are emphasized. This review aims to integrate mechanistic and translational insights into a coherent framework for therapeutic intervention. By defining how RNA modificatio

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research