Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsProspective StudyPubMed

A single intra-articular stromal vascular fraction with platelet-rich plasma injection yields superior clinical outcomes than a hyaluronic acid injection in patients with knee osteoarthritis: A prospective comparative st

Totlis T., Achlatis V., Emfietzis PK., Marín Fermín T., Pettas T., Sideridis A.

Prospective Study with a reported sample of 108 on Knee Osteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis, published in Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Prospective Study
Journal
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc (2025)
Country
Germany
Reported sample size
108
Source database
PubMed
PMID
40938868
DOI
10.1002/ksa.70068
Citations
1

Abstract (original English)

Purpose The present study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of a combined injection of stromal vascular fraction (SVF) and platelet rich plasma (PRP) versus a high molecular weight (HMW) hyaluronic acid (HA) injection in patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA). Methods A prospective comparative analysis was conducted for patients with KOA who underwent either a single intra-articular mechanical SVF combined with PRP injection (Group A) or a single intra-articular injection of HMW HA (Group B). The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the visual analogue scale (VAS) and the EuroQol EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) were assessed at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months postinjection. PRP was coded according to the DEPA classification. Results The study included 108 knees from 67 patients (Group A: 31; Group B: 36). The VAS, KOOS total and EQ-5D-5L scores significantly improved within each group in every timepoint compared to baseline. The SVF-PRP group significantly outperformed the HMW-HA group in VAS, KOOS total and EQ-5D-5L scores at 6 months and 12 months follow-up. The proportion of patients who achieved Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) at 12 months was 87.0% versus 57.4% (p = 0.0003) in KOOS, 74.1% versus 61.1% in VAS (p = 0.152) and 64.8% versus 40.7% (p = 0.005) in EQ-5D-5L, for the SVF-PRP vs HA group, respectively. No serious adverse events were reported in

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence
HumansPlatelet-Rich PlasmaHyaluronic AcidOsteoarthritis, KneeInjections, Intra-ArticularFemaleProspective StudiesMaleMiddle AgedAged

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research