Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsClinical TrialEurope PMCOpen access

Stem cell therapy for diabetic foot ulcers: a review of preclinical and clinical research

Lopes L., Setia O., Aurshina A., Liu S., Hu H., Isaji T.

Clinical Trial on Diabetic Foot, Peripheral Artery Disease, Chronic Wound, published in Stem Cell Res Ther (2018) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsEvidence level of this study

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Clinical Trial
Journal
Stem Cell Res Ther (2018)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
29996912
PMCID
PMC6042254
DOI
10.1186/s13287-018-0938-6
Citations
112

Abstract (original English)

Background Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is a severe complication of diabetes, preceding most diabetes-related amputations. DFUs require over US$9 billion for yearly treatment and are now a global public health issue. DFU occurs in the setting of ischemia, infection, neuropathy, and metabolic disorders that result in poor wound healing and poor treatment options. Recently, stem cell therapy has emerged as a new interventional strategy to treat DFU and appears to be safe and effective in both preclinical and clinical trials. However, variability in the stem cell type and origin, route and protocol for administration, and concomitant use of angioplasty confound easy interpretation and generalization of the results. Methods The PubMed, Google Scholar, and EMBASE databases were searched and 89 preclinical and clinical studies were selected for analysis. Results There was divergence between preclinical and clinical studies regarding stem cell type, origin, and delivery techniques. There was heterogeneous preclinical and clinical study design and few randomized clinical trials. Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor was employed in some studies but with differing protocols. Concomitant performance of angioplasty with stem cell therapy showed increased efficiency compared to either therapy alone. Conclusions Stem cell therapy is an effective treatment for diabetic foot ulcers and is curren

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

How we grade evidence
HumansDiabetic FootDiabetes ComplicationsWound HealingCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyAmputation, Surgical

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research