Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Stem Cell Therapy for Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Theory and Practice

Nalisa DL., Moneruzzaman M., Changwe GJ., Mobet Y., Li LP., Ma YJ.

Narrative Review with a reported sample of 216 on Diabetic Foot, Chronic Wound, published in J Diabetes Res (2022) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
J Diabetes Res (2022)
Reported sample size
216
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
36524153
PMCID
PMC9747315
DOI
10.1155/2022/6028743
Citations
16

Abstract (original English)

Diabetic foot ulcers are associated with increases in limb amputation, morbidity, and mortality. Recently, a stem cell application is emerging as promising adjuvant therapy. We presented available remedies by conducting a literature review on the application, safety, and efficacy of stem cell therapy. Relevant literature, including randomized control trials and article journals, was obtained from reputable search engines (PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science). We analyzed five credible cohorts, with variable sources of stem cells, in a total of 216 participants, 151 males and 65 females, age (mean ± SD) of 64.5 ± 9.6 years. With an average success of 86.41% in all Wagner-II lesions, mesenchymal SCA (stem cell application) is safe and effective, hence can significantly prevent limb amputation.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
HumansDiabetic FootDiabetes MellitusStem Cell TransplantationWound HealingAgedMiddle AgedFemaleMaleAmputation, Surgical

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research