Level A· Stronger Clinical EvidenceSystematic Review

Systematic Review of Stem Cells in Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery: Clinical Application in Anti-Aging Medicine.

Napoleon H., Djohan PB., Evelyn E., Lypinsky L., Luziani S., Margaretha MC.

Systematic Review on Cartilage Damage, Chronic Wound, Scar, Facial Rejuvenation, published in Indian J Plast Surg (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Systematic Review
Journal
Indian J Plast Surg (2026)
Country
Germany
Reported sample size
PMID
42344566
DOI
10.1055/s-0045-1812020

Abstract (original English)

The application of stem cells in plastic, reconstructive, and aesthetic surgery has emerged as a promising frontier in anti-aging medicine. Stem cells, particularly adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), are increasingly utilized for their regenerative properties, offering innovative solutions for a range of aesthetic and reconstructive challenges. This review explores the current and potential clinical applications of stem cells in plastic surgery, focusing on their role in grafting, facial rejuvenation, wound healing, soft tissue reconstruction, and hair restoration. A comprehensive literature analysis was conducted using the PRISMA algorithm, examining studies and clinical trials that evaluate the efficacy, safety, and outcomes of stem cell-based therapies in plastic surgery. Emphasis was placed on the therapeutic mechanisms of stem cells, including their ability to enhance tissue regeneration, reduce scarring, and improve graft survival. Out of the 5,117 studies identified, 22 met the inclusion criteria, highlighting the diverse applications of stem cells in plastic surgery. These studies reported significant advancements in aesthetic and reconstructive outcomes. Stem cell therapies represent a transformative approach in plastic surgery, offering significant benefits in aesthetic enhancement and functional restoration. While current applicatio

What this study does not prove

  • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

How we grade evidence

Related research