Level A· Stronger Clinical EvidenceSystematic ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

A Systematic Review of Submetatarsal Fat Pad Augmentation for the Treatment and Prevention of Diabetes-Related Foot Ulceration

Ashmore C., Virdee J., Culmer P., Edwards J., Siddle H., Warren J.

Systematic Review with a reported sample of 76 on Diabetic Foot, Chronic Wound, published in J Foot Ankle Res (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level A· Stronger Clinical EvidenceEvidence level of this study

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Systematic Review
Journal
J Foot Ankle Res (2025)
Reported sample size
76
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
40887711
PMCID
PMC12399362
DOI
10.1002/jfa2.70064
Citations
1

Abstract (original English)

Background Diabetes-related foot ulceration (DFU) represents a significant and increasing cause of morbidity and economic burden to health services. Surgical offloading has shown great effectiveness in the prevention and healing of DFU. The objective of this review is to assess the effectiveness of submetatarsal plantar fat pad modulation in preventing DFU and to characterise the different biomaterials used to this end. Methods The study was registered on PROSPERO. A search strategy of the PubMed, CINAHL and Cochrane biomedical databases was conducted. Any study which explored the modulation of the plantar submetatarsal fat pad for the prevention or treatment of DFU in adults was included. The main outcome was the occurrence of ulceration following intervention. Results Of the 3162 retrieved studies, 10 studies met inclusion criteria, describing outcomes for 76 participants with 112 ulcers or pre-ulcerative areas. Four studies report results of injectable liquid silicone in 55 participants, four studies included the use of an acellular allograft in eight participants, two studies included autolipotransplantation in 11 participants and one study reports on the use of injectable collagen in two participants. Only one randomised control trial was identified while the remainder of the studies were observational, case-series, or case-reports. The overall ulcer occurrence was 27/112

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueHumansDiabetic FootSiliconesCollagenBiocompatible MaterialsTreatment OutcomeWound HealingAdultAged

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research