Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Targeting the AGEs-RAGE axis: pathogenic mechanisms and therapeutic interventions in diabetic wound healing

Lin H., Yang Y., Wang X., Chung M., Zhang L., Cai S.

Narrative Review on Diabetic Foot, Chronic Wound, published in Front Med (Lausanne) (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Front Med (Lausanne) (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
41048949
PMCID
PMC12488618
DOI
10.3389/fmed.2025.1667620
Citations
6

Abstract (original English)

Diabetes is a global health problem, with diabetic wounds constituting one of its most severe complications. Advanced glycation end products (AGEs) and their receptor, the receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE), play a key role in the pathogenesis of diabetic wounds. Accumulated AGEs bind to RAGE, activating various inflammatory and oxidative stress pathways such as NF-κB, PI3K-AKT, and JAK-STAT signaling, impairing normal wound healing. This review describes mechanisms by which the AGEs-RAGE axis disrupts vascular function, immune regulation, and cellular regeneration, thereby driving the formation of chronic non-healing wounds. Furthermore, we discuss emerging therapeutic strategies targeting the AGEs-RAGE axis, such as selective RAGE inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, gene-based interventions, and AGE scavengers, highlighting their potential to enhance the treatment of diabetic chronic wounds.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research